Interactive demo

A simple machine-health story.

One fictional factory. One cooling-water pump that matters to the line. Choose a scenario, then walk through what the maintenance team would see and decide.

Simulated data. Every value on this page is generated to show a workflow. It is not a Robometic field measurement, not a functioning monitoring product and not evidence of performance.
Choose a scenario
Cooling-water pump CWP-2 (fictional)Pump drive end, vibration
Learned normalMachine behaviourChange worth a look
Level
Days observed
Status
Learning
Illustrative chart with generated values. Scale, review line and plant alarm level are for explanation only.

  1. Step 1

    The machine is running normally

    For seven days the pump is observed. Its usual vibration pattern, including the quieter night-time state, becomes the learned normal.

  2. Step 2

    Something changes

  3. Step 3

    An amber notice appears

  4. Step 4

    The maintenance team investigates

  5. Step 5

    A decision is recorded

    The example report shows what changed, what the team checked and what action was chosen. The evidence and the decision stay together.

Why the third scenario matters

False alarms are the biggest credibility risk in this field.

A system that flags every product change as a fault gets switched off within a month. The concept treats the operating state as part of normal, asks people to label what they find, and learns from the labels. The demo shows the honest limit: a baseline method knows that something changed, not why.

Normal operation

The system can establish a reference pattern. A quiet result is still a result.

Unusual vibration

An earlier warning can prompt an investigation while a planned repair is still possible.

Operating conditions change

A warning does not necessarily mean a machine fault. Review by people is part of the design.